One answer is that the North won it. In the period between the fourth week of June and the last days of September and early days of October, the South did reverse the tide, sweeping forward on a broad front from the tidewater of Virginia to the Plains Indian territory.
Brinkley, Alan, et al. Despite the South's failure to capitalize on its successes init came close to reversing the tide that ran against it beginning in February The South was way outclassed industrially.
In those virtues the Confederate soldier was unexcelled, and it's my belief that man-for-man there was no finer army in the history of America than the Army of Northern Virginia.
And furthermore, is any outcome "inevitable"? The Union, with its some 22, miles of track, was able to transport weaponry, clothes, food, soldiers, and whatever supplies were needed to almost any location in the entire theater. Sherman, Philip Sheridan, George H.
However, the ingenuity of many Southern officers compensated somewhat for her material disadvantages. With Lincoln's reelection, the road to Southern defeat grew shorter.
And so, in that sense, victory for the South was ultimately an impossibility. Rounding to the nearest 50, he arrived at a probable range oftodeaths, which averages out toWhat it needed was the guiding hand of "Queen Industry.
The monetary gains of the cash crop quickly took precedence over the basic necessity of the food crop, which could be gotten elsewhere. McPherson The principal cause of Confederate failure was the fact that the South's armies did not win enough victories in the field -- especially enough victories in a row in the field -- to both sustain Confederate morale behind the lines and depress Union morale behind the lines.
As historian William C.
This allowed slaves to pick much more cotton per day and therefore led most plantation owners to expand their land base. The only way the South could have won would have been for Lincoln to decide to lose. There also existed a problem in the fact that there were large gaps between many crucial parts of the South, which required suppliers to make detours over long distances or to carry goods between rails by wagon Catton, The Coming Fury The Bolsheviks had more capable commanders, capable of working with each other for strategic ends.
The South, unimpressed by this new modern technology and not having the money to experiment, chose not to delve very deeply into its development. The vast area of the Confederacy made occupation by an invader virtually impossible, and the coastline with its many inlets and bays made for difficult blockading.
Beliefs as to why the North won the war: Whitney developed a machine which would separate the seed from the cotton swiftly and effectively, cutting the harvesting time by more than one half "Industrial Revolution".
Samuel Slater can be credited with beginning the revolution of the textile industry in America. Garden City, New York: The Union infrastructure was far better, with twice the density of railroads, and several times the mileage of canals and well-surfaced roads. To the South, however, the war was a draining and debilitating leech, sucking the land dry of any semblance of economical formidability.
Can we truly answer this with the benefit of knowing history- so that we can easily discount any other options? New York alone produced manufactures of a value four times greater that the total Southern output ;the North had a virtual monopoly on heavy industries ;coal, iron, woollens, armaments, shipyards, machine shops - all were plentiful in the North and scarce in the South.
Instead, Jefferson Davis, as president, was able to continue insisting on no peace short of independence. In time these things would tell on the battlefield, certainly on the broader level. The telegraph had burst into American life inwhen Samuel Morse first transmitted, from the Supreme Court chamber in the capitol to Alfred Vail in Baltimore, his famous words "What hath God wrought!
In time these things would tell on the battlefield, certainly on the broader level. Historians have offered several explanations for the Confederate defeat in the Civil War.
The North was able to bring its industry and its manpower to bear in such a way that eventually, through sheer numerical and material advantage, it gained and maintained the upper hand.
Bythe Union could boast of its capacity to manufacture almost all of its own war materials using its own resources Brinkley et al. Why did the South fail to gain or maintain its independence? In a real two-party culture, Davis might have been pressured to compromise, or he might have been eased out, or the Congress might have been able to do something.
Beginning in the early s, traces of the industrial revolution in England began to bleed into several aspects of the American society. The Reds Communists won the Russian civil war because the British, French, American, and Japanese forces sent to support the whites were not committed.Why Did the South Lose the Civil War Essay A frequently, and sometimes hotly, discussed subject; the outcome of the American Civil War has fascinated historians for generations.
Some argue that the North's economic advantages proved too much for the South, others that Southern strategy was faulty, offensive when it should have been defensive. The Confederacy lost the Civil War for a variety of reasons, chief among them a lack of resources and manpower. The North had more soldiers, more manufacturing and agricultural capacity, and the ability to blockade Southern ports.
The institution of slavery also made it difficult to generate. The South lost the Civil War because of a number of factors. First, it was inherently weaker in the various essentials to win a military victory than the North.
The North had a population of more than twenty-two million people to the South’s nine-and-a-half million, of whom three-and-a-half million were slaves. Nov 15, · The South initially enjoyed the greater effective militia, extremely with calvary, and much greater effective management.
yet because of the fact the war went on, the North tailored and found out, on the same time as Status: Resolved. Why did the North win the Civil War?
The Civil War, or the "War between the states," was fought on both moral and economic grounds. It was certain advantages, however, inherent in the North, that inevitably told the tale of victory.
The the South counted on the North not having the stomach to stay in the war. They counted on the Union. In Aprilthe Civil war started in England. The civil war ended up by King Charles losing the war.
And in my essay I am going to talk about many reasons why Charles lost the civil war. In most people thought that King Charles would win the civil war, as he had won the battle of Edge hill, but unfortunately King Charles did not take.Download